Re: [DNSOP] getting back to our work on special use names

2017-01-26 Thread tjw ietf
I think updating alt-tld draft to point to the specific problems in sutld-ps to be useful. I am holding out hope that alt-tld will be unstuck and kicked down the road. I also am holding out for a pony. tim On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Ralph Droms wrote: > > > On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:47 PM, W

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-06.txt

2017-01-26 Thread Warren Kumari
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:04:42PM -0400, > Bob Harold wrote > a message of 124 lines which said: > >> Those changes look good to me. > > OK for me also. > > Except may be the new word "sandbox" that appeared in -06. It is not > the u

Re: [DNSOP] getting back to our work on special use names

2017-01-26 Thread Warren Kumari
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Ralph Droms wrote: > >> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:41 PM Suzanne Woolf wrote: >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> >> It's time to get back to our work on special use names. As the chairs see >> it, here's what w

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Digest, Vol 122, Issue 24

2017-01-26 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Jan 23, 2017, at 3:00 PM, dnsop-requ...@ietf.org wrote: > > I've been following this discussion and have taken a few weeks to think > about the comments rendered here in some depth. I find that I most agree > with this statement: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:53:39PM +, Warren Kumari