joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 12/29/16 1:51 PM, william manning wrote:
> > if this work does proceed, i'd like to insist that it carry a
> > disclaimer that it is designed specifically for closed networks and is
> > not to be used in the Internet.
>
> this sounds like an aplicability statement to be i
ok. here is a draft applicability statement.
This draft is documents a process and method for intercepting DNS queries
and fabricating responses to redirect the querier into a walled garden or
enclave that is NOT part of the open Internet. Adoption and acceptance of
this draft is an acknowledgem
> On Jan 1, 2017, at 6:00 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
> There is no _way_ to make it easier for said outside forces to pressure
> providers. They have the force of law on their side. What we do makes no
> difference in that arena. The arena in which it _does_ make a difference is
> protectin
Andre,
On Dec 20, 2016, at 9:49 PM, ac wrote:
> I once made a very cool tool, it improved the life of many people as it
> allowed anyone to take over any pc running a certain operating system
> with the sole and great purpose of helping more users. It too was
> published, improved, altered and di
