Fujiwara-san,
I was strongly opposed to the idea after your DNS-OARC presentation
and I am glad you are continuing the effort :).
I had some private conversation with Ralf Weber from Nominum and
we have conducted few experiments (and I plan to do more).
My biggest concern is that your draft is m
Hello Robert,
On 12 Oct 2016, at 21:38, Robert Edmonds wrote:
What are status queries? Were they ever defined? Are they obsolete?
I have been unable to find a definition, and I tried quite hard earlier
this year when a customer complained we were not handling them! Some
VOIP equipment that
> On 9 Nov 2016, at 12:01, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> Hello Robert,
>
> On 12 Oct 2016, at 21:38, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>
>> What are status queries? Were they ever defined? Are they obsolete?
>
> I have been unable to find a definition, and I tried quite hard earlier this
> year when a custo
One more thought I have just realized in the discussion with my colleague and
that might tilt the scales towards the Fujiwara-san's proposal.
The modern authoritative nameservers tries to minimize the amount of data given
back, so they don't fill an AUTHORITATIVE section for every query. The
co
Hi Matt,
I cannot help noticing that draft-pounsett-transferring-automated-dnssec-zones
is providing the same solution as an earlier draft
draft-koch-dnsop-dnssec-operator-change.
This draft has already gone through a review process, and is considered to be
done content wise by the authors.
Th
