[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-03.txt

2016-10-31 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF. Title : DNS Terminology Authors : Paul Hoffman Andrew Sullivan

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-03.txt

2016-10-31 Thread Paul Hoffman
Greetings. As y'all can see from the diff, we added most of the things that the WG proposed, but not much else. This is due mostly to a failure on the authors' part, not on the WG's part. We still have a list of things we want to do, but didn't get to in the past few months. We apologize, and w

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-04.txt

2016-10-31 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF. Title : Managing DS records from parent via CDS/CDNSKEY Authors : Olafur Gudmundsson

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-04.txt

2016-10-31 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF. Title : Managing DS records from parent via CDS/CDNSKEY Autho

Re: [DNSOP] FYI - Added note about ECDSA resolver issue in Sweden - Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-york-dnsop-deploying-dnssec-crypto-algs-02.txt

2016-10-31 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On 31 October 2016 at 00:22, George Michaelson wrote: > It is only my personal opinion, but I believe registrars are incorrect > in performing crypto alg checks on proffered DS, and this is an > entirely unwarranted, and incorrect understanding of their role. It > conflates one public good (check

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-00.txt

2016-10-31 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF. Title : Special-Use Names Problem Statement Authors : Ted Lemon Ralph Droms

[DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dickinson-dnsop-dns-capture-format-00.txt

2016-10-31 Thread Sara Dickinson
Hi All, We have just published a new draft on a proposed format for DNS packet capture - please see below for details. We would very much appreciate feedback on the overall problem discussed here in addition to the details of the format proposed. Please note: There are three diagrams in this

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ip6rdns-00.txt

2016-10-31 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF. Title : Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service Providers Author : Lee Howard Filename: d

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-01.txt

2016-10-31 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF. Title : DNS Session Signaling Authors : Ray Bellis Stuart Cheshire

Re: [DNSOP] FYI - Added note about ECDSA resolver issue in Sweden - Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-york-dnsop-deploying-dnssec-crypto-algs-02.txt

2016-10-31 Thread Geoff Huston
> On 1 Nov. 2016, at 3:37 am, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > > > On 31 October 2016 at 00:22, George Michaelson wrote: > It is only my personal opinion, but I believe registrars are incorrect > in performing crypto alg checks on proffered DS, and this is an > entirely unwarranted, and incorrect

Re: [DNSOP] FYI - Added note about ECDSA resolver issue in Sweden - Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-york-dnsop-deploying-dnssec-crypto-algs-02.txt

2016-10-31 Thread George Michaelson
The net effect is the same in respect of new algorithms. I'm fine with checking conformance if the algorithm is known, it feels like a low bar. Rejecting sigs because you don't know how to check feels like a huge impediment to technology: The use of the new algorithm is now gated by the ability of

Re: [DNSOP] FYI - Added note about ECDSA resolver issue in Sweden - Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-york-dnsop-deploying-dnssec-crypto-algs-02.txt

2016-10-31 Thread Geoff Huston
> On 1 Nov. 2016, at 11:22 am, George Michaelson wrote: > > The net effect is the same in respect of new algorithms. I'm fine with > checking conformance if the algorithm is known, it feels like a low > bar. > > Rejecting sigs because you don't know how to check feels like a huge > impediment t