>I'm inclined to conclude (as suggested off-list) that, while it
>may be prudent to parse conservatively, and not make ordering
>assumptions, in fact less tolerant stub resolvers are sufficiently
>common and so one would likely get away with assuming natural
>ordering. So perhaps doing it right is
The problem is that you are doing the same thing I was just talking
about: looking at the things you care about, and leaving out
everything else.
It's possible that there simply isn't energy to do this work, in which
case we definitely shouldn't do it. But what we are trying to do
with our docum
On 09/30/2016 01:03 AM, George Michaelson wrote:
> Thats precisely why its NOT a false analogy: the design model in the
> IETF is that the value doesn't matter, but in the DNS, the design
> model is "follow the money"
>
> [snip]
>
> If they see inherent value in the string, then they immediately wa
