Re: [DNSOP] Where in a CNAME chain is the QNAME?

2016-09-23 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:13:50PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote a message of 68 lines which said: > This issue was spotted by Peter van Dijk. It is about > draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-05, recently approved by IESG. The > problem is the definition of "QNAME" when there is a CNAME chain.

[DNSOP] More on Special Use Domain Registry

2016-09-23 Thread Edward Lewis
I have gotten the sense of a belief that IANA (the IANA functions office) runs many registries for the IETF and they are not controversial and because of this, the issues surrounding the Special Use Domain Name registry are all fluff and no substance. But the Special Use Domain Name registry is

Re: [DNSOP] More on Special Use Domain Registry

2016-09-23 Thread Philip Homburg
>This writing is in reaction to a rather limited set of participants in the disc >ussions on the topic. Maybe that is appropriate, maybe that is a reflection th >at the DNSOP WG is not the best place to cover this topic. That is not an insu >lt because there's a significant difference between the

Re: [DNSOP] Where in a CNAME chain is the QNAME?

2016-09-23 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:22:32AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:13:50PM +0200, > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote > a message of 68 lines which said: > > > This issue was spotted by Peter van Dijk. It is about > > draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-05, recently approved

Re: [DNSOP] Where in a CNAME chain is the QNAME?

2016-09-23 Thread Robert Edmonds
Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:22:32AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:13:50PM +0200, > > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote > > a message of 68 lines which said: > > > > > This issue was spotted by Peter van Dijk. It is about > > > draft-ietf-dn

Re: [DNSOP] More on Special Use Domain Registry

2016-09-23 Thread Alain Durand
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 8:15 AM, Edward Lewis wrote: > > If it seems that there is limited discussion during this two-week period and > the consensus is that this is not a topic for the WG, I think that it is > understandable. Although many in DNSOP WG have expertise for this, the > roster of

Re: [DNSOP] More on Special Use Domain Registry

2016-09-23 Thread Ted Lemon
This is really well put, Ed. Thanks. I'm a little tempted to plagiarize you. On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Edward Lewis wrote: > I have gotten the sense of a belief that IANA (the IANA functions office) > runs many registries for the IETF and they are not controversial and > because of th