Folks (including Patrik)...
Hi.
Checking on where group views are, now that some exchanges have happened
and time has passed...
On 8/3/2016 8:48 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
And now, my response to John's note...
On 8/3/2016 6:58 PM, John Levine wrote:
The services, on the other hand, were tho
>> So after going through all that and then looking at RFC 6335, including
>> its assorted references to support for SRV, I gather the IANA table in
>> question is:
>>
>>Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry
>
>And the draft -attrleaf- needs to point to this, I believe.
So f
On 8/28/2016 6:42 PM, John Levine wrote:
atrik's and John 's postings notwithstanding, I'm still concerned about
>the proposed way of handling this, namely to rely on IANA to do a manual
>check of the two registries the URI RR might call on. First, it does
>not seem reasonable to me to impose th
Ray,
At 2016-08-26 18:40:40 +0100
Ray Bellis wrote:
> On 26/08/2016 17:57, 神明達哉 wrote:
> > I just noticed e.root-servers.net has :
> >
> > % dig @a.root-servers.net e.root-servers.net +short
> > 2001:500:a8::e
> >
> > It seems to be added very recently:
> > http://root-servers.org/arc
On 28 Aug 2016, at 18:58, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 8/28/2016 6:42 PM, John Levine wrote:
atrik's and John 's postings notwithstanding, I'm still concerned
about
>the proposed way of handling this, namely to rely on IANA to do a
manual
>check of the two registries the URI RR might call on. First
On 8/28/2016 8:15 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Simply put, specifying a smal task that requires humans to perform
perfectly at random, very (very) infrequent times, is a plan designed
to fail.
Can't this be checked by scraping IANA on a daily basis? That is, if
IANA makes a mistake, it will be dete
Actually, any of the root ops have that data. I suspect this is a
"pre-opening", to gauge reachability of the prefix before public commit.
That was the operational practice for the 20+ years I was active in root
ops.
/Wm
On Sunday, 28 August 2016, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Ray,
>
> At 2016-08-26 18:
Bill,
At 2016-08-28 21:28:19 -0700
william manning wrote:
> Actually, any of the root ops have that data. I suspect this is a
> "pre-opening", to gauge reachability of the prefix before public commit.
> That was the operational practice for the 20+ years I was active in root
> ops.
Can you ple
Tim,
[ Apologies for coming late to the party. I was on vacation. ]
At 2016-08-16 08:57:04 -0400
Tim Wicinski wrote:
> In Berlin we had two presentations on different methods of returning
> multiple responses:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses/
>
> h
