On 8/4/16, 20:03, "DNSOP on behalf of Tim Wicinski" wrote:
>Remember the Resolver Priming draft?
Comments on the draft
(https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-07.txt):
## 3.3. DNSSEC with Priming Queries
##
##The resolver MAY set the DNSSEC OK [RFC4033] bit. At the ti
At Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:31:18 -0700,
"Paul Hoffman" wrote:
> > - Section 2
> >
> >Therefore, it is important that resolvers be able to cope with
> >change, even without relying upon configuration updates to be
> > applied
> >by their operator.
> >
> > If we really want to make it wor
> On Aug 19, 2016, at 11:38 AM, 神明達哉 wrote:
>
> At Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:54:39 -0700,
> "Paul Hoffman" wrote:
>
>> [[ A month later, we're still eager to hear responses to the draft. We
>> got a few that we have incorporated for a new version, but want to be
>> sure we're on the right track befo
