Hello,
There are a few suggestions about the DNS over HTTP draft made off-list,
which I will try to characterize here:
* We should expand the motivations to explain why DNS over HTTP makes
sense at all.
* We should restrict the protocol to TLS.
I am happy to expand the motivation section, al
On 5 Aug 2016, at 16:05, Wes Hardaker wrote:
"Ben Campbell" writes:
[everything else addressed but I had a question about this last one:]
-8: Seems like there could be more to say about the potential
consequences about the “fail or proceed without security”
decision
in 6
and 6.1.
I thin
Thanks for starting the discussion Shane.
On 8 August 2016 at 23:41, Shane Kerr wrote:
> My own feeling is that this should be
> enough; apparently the recommendation to require TLS was made in the
> HTTP/2 working group and rejected, so I am not sure that we need to
> re-visit the entire discuss
