[DNSOP] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-08: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-08: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer t

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-lee-dnsop-recursion-performance-improvement-00.txt

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:21:32AM -0800, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote a message of 42 lines which said: > Title : An approach to improve recursion performance > Authors : Xiaodong Lee > Hongtao Li > Haiku

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-00.txt

There's talk about protocol switches. I think that's a misnomer. There are resolution switches. I see a lot of utility in it being the top-level name in a Domain Name. (I'm not ready to say that's the best way to go.) Until .onion, the protocol switch for all of the special names was at the

Re: [DNSOP] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-08: (with COMMENT)

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 08:30:29AM -0800, Stephen Farrell wrote a message of 30 lines which said: > The secdir review noted some nits you might want to fix > at auth-48. [1] Yes, it has been done in -08

Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:56 PM, IETF Secretariat < ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> wrote: > > The DNSOP WG has placed draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf in state > Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski) > > The document is available at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-crocker-dns-att

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-01.txt

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:07 PM, wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working > Group of the IETF. > > Title : A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers -

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-01.txt

In message , Bob Harold writes: > Section 4. Firewalls and Load Balancers > > "Requests with unknown EDNS versions is expected client behaviour > should not be trued as an attack The correct" > > should be: > > "Requests with unknown EDNS versions is expected client behaviour > and should not

Re: [DNSOP] new Resource record?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 09:56:26PM +0100, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote: > > Second, from the quick description, I don't quite understand what you want > > to solve. Not complaining, but in preparing to ask for a new type, the > > use case might need to be clearer. > > Authentication and authorization in

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-lee-dnsop-recursion-performance-improvement-00.txt

In message <20151211173028.ga27...@nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:21:32AM -0800, > internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote > a message of 42 lines which said: > > > Title : An approach to improve recursion performance > > Authors :