[DNSOP] About reserving .corp, .home, and .mail

2015-12-02 Thread John Levine
ICANN's published the final version of JAS' namespace collision report. The first version came out a year ago but parts of it were redacted because they stumbled across a horrible bug in some Microsoft software and wanted to give MS time to fix it. The final version isn't very different other tha

[DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2015-12-02 Thread IETF Secretariat
The DNSOP WG has placed draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf/ Comment: There is useful need for this to be documented, for better or for worse. _

Re: [DNSOP] About reserving .corp, .home, and .mail

2015-12-02 Thread Warren Kumari
Yup. This is very similar to what the earlier JAS report ( https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-mitigation-26feb14-en.pdf) said: RECOMMENDATION 1: The TLDs .corp, .home, and .mail be permanently reserved for internal use and receive RFC 1918-like protection/treatment, potentia

Re: [DNSOP] About reserving .corp, .home, and .mail

2015-12-02 Thread John R Levine
The slidedeck presented at the NameCollisions workshop said: "The TLDs .corp, .home and .mail should be permanently reserved" Yup, we were both there. The new report has more details, notably that when he looked at the traffic for corp.com, which he figured would get traffic from DNS search l

Re: [DNSOP] About reserving .corp, .home, and .mail

2015-12-02 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Warren Kumari writes: > > Yup. This is very similar to what the earlier JAS report ( > https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-mitigation-26feb14 > -en.pdf) > said: > RECOMMENDATION 1: The TLDs .corp, .home, and .mail be permanently > reserved for internal use and