As informational (BCP), of course (see below). As advice to TLD
operators uniformly, I'm unconvinced, but listening.
On 11/27/15 9:54 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 05:20:05PM +, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:51 PM Roy Arends wrote:
I support the ge
I'm not the WG Chair who is handling the day-to-day responsibilities (I
just do all the other boring DNS stuff), but I do know this:
- design team is being put together but was not complete
- Ralph Droms (AD for 6761) is the head of the design team
- they are still looking for 1-2 people with
Hi
the Call for Adoption has ended a day ago and we've gotten positive
comments to adopt and no negative comments.
The big issue is a BCP but not to force operators to fix things (as much
as we would like to).
I want to thank Mark for doing this work, and taking in all the comments
from t
You are correct Eric. I was pointing it out to the working group I
co-chair, but hope other WG Chairs would do the same thing.
And thank you Paul and Warren for offering your time to discuss the
duties.
tim
On 11/27/15 2:23 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
if i may, i would like to sugge
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-wessels-edns-key-tag
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wessels-edns-key-tag/
There was unanimous support this during the meeting in Yokohama, so this
is more of a formality, unless we hear strong negative reaction.
H
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure
To Respond.
Author : M. And
There was a lot of positive support for this draft in Yokohama, so this
is considered
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-ogud-dnsop-maintain-ds
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ogud-dnsop-maintain-ds/
Please review this draft to see if you think it i
>> > I support the general concept (responsive servers are often better
>> > netizens) and will review the draft, so I support this draft for WG
>> > adoption.
>>
>> Yah, me too.
>
>Count me in.
Likewise.
R's,
John
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
