On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:08 PM, 神明達哉 wrote:
> At Sun, 22 Nov 2015 14:52:34 +0100,
> Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> > > I've read draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-00
> >
> > Do note that -01 will be out in the next days and there are
> > substantial changes. So, readers may prefer to wait 48h
One of the concerns in the document is "when to send the option."
I'll state the assumption that this is most useful for RFC 5011
["Automated Updates of DNS Security (DNSSEC) Trust Anchors"] situations.
Perhaps it is not exclusively use to that, but I'll presume that for this
suggestion.
In RFC 5
Hi Ed,
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 9:00 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:
>
> One of the concerns in the document is "when to send the option."
>
> I'll state the assumption that this is most useful for RFC 5011
> ["Automated Updates of DNS Security (DNSSEC) Trust Anchors"] situations.
> Perhaps it is not exc
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:25:29 +, "Wessels, Duane" wrote:
>
>> On Nov 23, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jinmei
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:31:23AM -0800, 神明達哉 wrote:
>>> At Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:37:48 +0530,
>>> Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
>>>
While looking at a bu
In message <17673.1448400...@dash.isi.edu>, John Heidemann writes:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:25:29 +, "Wessels, Duane" wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 23, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jinmei
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:31:23AM -0800, $B?@L@C#:H(B wrote:
> >>> At
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 7706
Title: Decreasing Access Time to Root
Servers by Running One on Loopback
Author: W. Kumari, P. Hoffman
Status: Informational
Stream:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:23:50 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>
>In message <17673.1448400...@dash.isi.edu>, John Heidemann writes:
>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:25:29 +, "Wessels, Duane" wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Nov 23, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Jinmei
>> >>
>> >> On M
Hi,
I have read this draft and have a number of comments. I can not say these are
the only ones, but at least some :-)
The dominant protocol for name resolution on the Internet is the
Domain Name System (DNS). However, other protocols exist that are
fundamentally different from the DNS