On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 8:14 PM, John Levine wrote:
> >I would sign up as chair if there is enough interest to resurrect this.
>
> I brought it up, I'm willing to work on it.
>
Likewise. Also willing to help DISPATCH it via another route if DNSOP
doesn't take it up. :-)
-MSK
_
On 14/11/2015 17:07, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Done.
>
> This will be the third or fourth try for the document. Perhaps there is
> now enough community interest to make it happen?
Thanks Dave :)
>From my previous recollection of this, ISTR there was a suggestion that
your draft only directly reg
Friendly reminder...
> -Original Message-
> From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kash, Howard M
CIV USARMY RDECOM
> ARL (US)
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 12:39 PM
> To: dnsop@ietf.org
> Subject: [DNSOP] Advance notice - H-root address change on December 1,
2015
>
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
(dnsop) to consider the following document:
- 'The edns-tcp-keepalive EDNS0 Option'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send su
>>From my previous recollection of this, ISTR there was a suggestion that
>your draft only directly register "single-label" names, but with "_tcp",
>"_udp" et al listed in the registry as a link to RFC 6335?
It seems to me that this needs three columns, like this:
NameReference Type
_tc
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Shumon Huque wrote:
I've read this document and think it proposes a useful capability.
Thanks for your feedback Shumon! (I think you read -03 and not -04)
Some other quick comments:
> This document specifies an EDNS0 extension that allows a validating
> Resolver running
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : Chain Query requests in DNS
Author : Paul Wouters
Filename: draft-
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Subject: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query-05.txt
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query-05
This includes some textual changes based on Shu
This example as the wrong length unless you want every from wire
reader to be re-written to not look for the root label. Given the
comment about no compression pointers this should be wire format
not text format.
"com." has length 0x05 (0x03 0x63 0x6f 0x6d 0x00)
o The upstream Recursi
