On 11/13/2015 10:58 PM, Ray Bellis wrote:
> Dave Crocker previously did some work on an I-D for a (portless) service
> type registry - I recall he and I discussed it back at the Orlando IETF.
>
> It would be good to see that resurrected.
Done.
This will be the third or fourth try for the docume
>Done.
>
>This will be the third or fourth try for the document. Perhaps there is
>now enough community interest to make it happen?
The more I look at this, the more of a mess I find. It's not like it
would have been all up to you. RFC 6335 came out five years after the
first version of your dr
On 11/13/2015 09:55 AM, A. Schulze wrote:
consider a nameserver ns.example.com serving example.com. There is a
delegation from com. including glue.
Now we add a childzone sub.example.com. served by the same nameserver
ns.example.com.
should I add a entry in example.com to delegate the subzone to
On 11/14/2015 12:28 PM, John Levine wrote:
> RFC 6335 came out five years after the
> first version of your draft and would have been a fine opportunity to
> de-mess.
Given what it was trying to do, I don't think they could reasonably have
tackled this topic. However I suppose it's nice that they
Dave
I would sign up as chair if there is enough interest to resurrect this.
tim
On 11/14/15 12:07 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 11/13/2015 10:58 PM, Ray Bellis wrote:
Dave Crocker previously did some work on an I-D for a (portless) service
type registry - I recall he and I discussed it back a
In article <5648026d.9040...@gmail.com> you write:
>
>Dave
>
>I would sign up as chair if there is enough interest to resurrect this.
I brought it up, I'm willing to work on it.
R's,
John
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailm
I think this is OK as an individual and as co-chair.
tim
On 11/13/15 3:04 PM, John Levine wrote:
why not just go ahead and register the names through
http://www.iana.org/form/ports-services? Don't be intimidated by all
of the references on the application form
If people think that's OK, I'
