[DNSOP] 6761bis Design Team Lead

All, In the interests of supporting the 6761 design team moving forward, we’re naming a lead for it— someone whose job is not only to participate in the work as he’s able, but to enable progress for the entire team. Ralph Droms has significant history with the 6761 issues (he was the AD who

Re: [DNSOP] 6761bis Design Team Lead

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > All, > > In the interests of supporting the 6761 design team moving forward, we’re > naming a lead for it— someone whose job is not only to participate in the > work as he’s able, but to enable progress for the entire team. > > Ralph Droms has

[DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query

Hi The authors have updated their document to address all outstanding issues, and we feel the document is ready for Working Group Last Call. This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query Current versions of the draft is available here: https://datatracke

[DNSOP] discussion for draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-00.txt

All, Apologies for any procedural missteps as I am new to the group but am trainable. I am looking to get some traction on a recent I-D my group is working on and am looking for advice along the way. We are confident this draft can play a significant role in the future of DNS especially as it re

[DNSOP] meeting prep: scribes

Hi, DNSOP meets in the morning slot on Thursday. Final agenda coming soon— thanks for your patience. As usual, we’re looking for a minute taker and a jabber scribe— if you’re willing to help out, please let the chairs know— off-list is fine. thanks, Suzanne & Tim

Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-00.txt

Process wise, you should seek to have this on the experimental track. It has potential but is far from a sure thing. The idea of being able to send formulas for generating responses, particularly for address records, reverse map and CNAME is a latent need in the DNS hosting industry. These types

[DNSOP] comments on draft-wessels-edns-key-tag-00

I've read draft-wessels-edns-key-tag-00. I think it's generally well written. I have a few small comments. - Sections 5.2.1 When the recursive server receives a query with the option set, the recursive server SHOULD set the edns-key-tag list for any outgoing iterative queries for that

[DNSOP] comments on draft-muks-dnsop-dns-message-checksums

I've read draft-muks-dnsop-dns-message-checksums-01. I think it's quite well written. I have a couple of comments about the draft: 1. I wonder whether this should be merged to draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies, as both try to solve the same/similar problems with quite similar approaches (note: I be

Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-00.txt

See inline comments: > -Original Message- > From: Edward Lewis [mailto:edward.le...@icann.org] > Subject: Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-00.txt > > Process wise, you should seek to have this on the experimental track. It > has potential but is far from a sure thing.

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-07.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. Title : Domain Name System (DNS) Cookies Authors : Donald E. Eastlake

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-06.txt

Thanks Donald, I'm going to work on the Shepherd writeup and have it out by Thursday. tim On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote: > Revised version has been uploaded. > > Thanks, > Donald > = > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 155

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-06.txt

Revised version has been uploaded. Thanks, Donald = Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e...@gmail.com On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > On 10/28/15 7:03 AM, Donald Eastlake wrote: >>

Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-wessels-edns-key-tag-00

> On Nov 2, 2015, at 1:23 PM, 神明達哉 wrote: > > I've read draft-wessels-edns-key-tag-00. I think it's generally well > written. I have a few small comments. Thank you for the review. > > - Sections 5.2.1 > > When the recursive server > receives a query with the option set, the recursive

[DNSOP] comments on draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any-01

I've read draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any-01. I have a few comments: - Section 3 ANY queries are sometimes used to help mine authoritative-only DNS servers for zone data, since they return all RRSets for a particular owner name. A DNS zone maintainer might prefer not to send full ANY

Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-muks-dnsop-dns-message-checksums

Hi Jinmei Thank you for the review. - Original Message - > From: "神明達哉" > To: "dnsop" > Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 1:31:56 PM > Subject: [DNSOP] comments on draft-muks-dnsop-dns-message-checksums > I've read draft-muks-dnsop-dns-message-checksums-01. I think it's > quite well writ