Bob's point is correct (I certainly agree/that's what I meant to convey) and
Kevin is right, something got lost between brain and keyboard.
Thanks.
Sent from aomething with no kybosrd.
On Oct 31, 2015, at 05:49, Darcy Kevin (FCA)
mailto:kevin.da...@fcagroup.com>> wrote:
I think there's someth
An FYI for those attending the IETF, the IRTF Open Meeting on Tuesday
Afternoon (17:10 JST) has a talk that may be of interest to DNSOP folks:
Roland van Rijswijk-Deij on a detailed measurement study on a large
dataset of DNSSEC-signed domains:
Roland van Rijswijk-Deij, Anna Sperotto, and Ai
Given that there are least three implementations based on this draft in
widespread use, IMHO, I believe this draft should move forward as is. As
mentioned below, a stable reference would be useful for implementers like
myself. -Rick
-Original Message-
From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...
This is a good suggestion. I support it.
Mehmet
On Saturday, October 31, 2015, Richard Lamb wrote:
> Given that there are least three implementations based on this draft in
> widespread use, IMHO, I believe this draft should move forward as is. As
> mentioned below, a stable reference would be
Hi,
Just a clarification to the wg, since I think my earlier note on this
was buried in some long thread -- the authors of
draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor have taken it to the ISE and it has
been accepted as a draft on the independent stream.
The next step in the process is for some people
Joe,
Thanks for the update.
Those of you who supported publication— I assume Joe will be reminding you to
review :-)
best,
Suzanne
> On Oct 31, 2015, at 4:50 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a clarification to the wg, since I think my earlier note on this was
> buried in some long th
