Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-00

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:50:58PM +, Evan Hunt wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:10:29AM -0700, Paul Vixie wrote: > > there's been enough churn at isc in recent years that probably noone now > > working there remembers metazones. > > > > muks, et al, see:

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-00

Paul Vixie wrote: > > it's terribly simple. laziness can't be an excuse, it just wasn't that > difficult! see: . Oh excellent, thanks, I didn't know the code was available. I shall have a look! (All I previously knew about was the paywalled article in a Ja

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any-01.txt

I have a strong objection to this document. In the introduction is it said: "The DNS specification [RFC1034] [RFC1035] does not include specific guidance for the behaviour of DNS servers or clients in this situation. This document aims to provide such guidance." It is true that the origin