On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On May 9, 2015, at 6:07 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>> In Section 2, there should be a new paragraph after the first paragraph
>>> that describes why the "reasonable attempt" in the first paragraph is
>>> needed to determine whether the attack
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 03:08:11PM +0200, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> "It is RECOMMENDED that implementations warn operators (or treat as an
>> error) if they attempt to add an NTA for a domain that has a
>> configured positive trust anchor."
>
> You
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust Anchors
Authors : Paul Ebersman
Reminder:
DNSOP Virtual Interim Meeting to discuss the questions around RFC 6761
and the "Special Names" Registry. Dial In Details Below.
For those attending RIPE, we've been told a room has set aside.
We are also looking for some volunteers for the following
jabber scribe
note taker
someone
