[DNSOP] Terminology: primary, secondary, master, slave

2015-04-24 Thread Paul Hoffman
Greetings again. Based on Casey's proposal, I would like to make the following changes. Thoughts? --Paul Hoffman CURRENT: Primary servers and secondary servers --- These are synonyms for "master server" and "slave server", which were the terms used in the early DNS RFCs, and defined below. The

[DNSOP] Terminology: forwarding and forwarder

2015-04-24 Thread Paul Hoffman
Greetings again. After the active discussion on these terms, we propose the following, which tries to hew closely to both RFCs. Comments are certainly welcome. --Paul Hoffman Forwarding -- The process of one server sending a DNS query with the RD bit set to 1 to another server to resolve

[DNSOP] Terminology: policy-implementing resolver

2015-04-24 Thread Paul Hoffman
Greetings again. Based on input from Stéphane and Hugo, I came up with the following to replace the current two terms. Does this work for people? --Paul Hoffman Policy-implementing resolver -- A resolver acting in recursive mode that changes some of the answers that it returns based on pol

Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: policy-implementing resolver

2015-04-24 Thread Paul Ferguson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 4/24/2015 5:57 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. Based on input from Stéphane and Hugo, I came up > with the following to replace the current two terms. Does this work > for people? > > --Paul Hoffman > > Policy-implementing resolver -

Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: policy-implementing resolver

2015-04-24 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Apr 24, 2015, at 6:38 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote: > > Policy-implementing resolver -- A resolver acting in recursive > > mode that changes some of the answers that it returns based on > > policy criteria, such as to prevent access to malware sites or > > objectionable content. In general, a stub

Re: [DNSOP] draft-livingood-dnsop-negative-trust-anch...@tools.ietf.org

2015-04-24 Thread Warren Kumari
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:31 PM, 神明達哉 wrote: > I've read the draft. Overall it's pretty well written. I also > personally support the idea of NTAs; although I see its side effect > and the possibility of abuse, the draft seems to do its best to > explain the implications and avoid abusing. > > He

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-04.txt

2015-04-24 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. Title : Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust Anchors Authors : Paul Ebersman