On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 04:40:07PM -0400,
Ted Lemon wrote
a message of 13 lines which said:
> Master and disciple? ;)
I asked on Twitter and got:
jedi/padawan
master/dog
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinf
On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:41 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> jedi/padawan
>
> master/dog
These are certainly fun, but probably don't translate as well... :)
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
On Apr 8, 2015, at 10:15 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> We're now proposing the week of May 11th, 2015. The chairs don't wish to
> inflict meetings on the working group for Monday or Friday. We are
> considering Thursday, May 14th 1400 UTC, but will welcome any and all
> opinions on this matter.
>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 10:15 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>> We're now proposing the week of May 11th, 2015. The chairs don't wish to
>> inflict meetings on the working group for Monday or Friday. We are
>> considering Thursday, May 14th 1400 UTC,
On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:02 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> Hopefully one that will for for those folk who a: live in Europe and /
> or b: will be at DNS-OARC and the DNS track at RIPE...
>
> Seeing as Interims are supposed to be announced >=30 days in the
> future I'm guessing not the 14th of May…
H
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : DNS Terminology
Authors : Paul Hoffman
Andrew Sullivan
On Apr 14, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Seeing as Interims are supposed to be announced >=30 days in the
> future I'm guessing not the 14th of May...
If this is a virtual interim two weeks is sufficient. I thought this _was_ a
virtual interim. Not so?
___
On 4/14/15 6:52 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> Seeing as Interims are supposed to be announced >=30 days in the
>> future I'm guessing not the 14th of May...
>
> If this is a virtual interim two weeks is sufficient. I thought this _was_
> a virtual
On Tuesday, April 14, 2015, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Warren Kumari > wrote:
> > Seeing as Interims are supposed to be announced >=30 days in the
> > future I'm guessing not the 14th of May...
>
> If this is a virtual interim two weeks is sufficient. I thought this
> _was
