[DNSOP] [TCP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-00.txt

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 05:58:01AM -0800, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote a message of 37 lines which said: > Title : DNS Transport over TCP - Implementation Requirements One month later... Sorry. I have read draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-00 and I like it. I think the general ide

Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 11:17:13AM -0800, David Conrad wrote a message of 120 lines which said: > Some comments on the qname-minimisation draft: Many of them integrated in the live text at Expect a ne

Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

Stephane, >> While the pointer to the dns-privacy draft is helpful as a >> reference, I figure the introduction/background section should >> provide an introduction to the specific problem the draft is >> attempting to address and why it is a problem. > > I tend to disagree. The whole point of th

Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

> As mentioned before, there are several ways to implement qname > minimisation. Two main strategies are the aggressive one and the lazy > one. In the aggressive one, the resolver only sends NS queries as long > as it does not know the zone cuts. This is the safest, from a privacy > point of view.