[DNSOP] an editorial review of draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize-13

It has been pointed out that the DNS Referral Response Size Issues I-D should not be left going to final expiry, and I have performed a new review of the last version, draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize-13. I only found a small number of remaining editorial nits -- either formerly overlooked or newly intro

Re: [DNSOP] an editorial review of draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize-13

On 4/25/2012 4:58 PM, Alfred � wrote: > It has been pointed out that the DNS Referral Response Size Issues > I-D should not be left going to final expiry, and I have performed > a new review of the last version, draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize-13. > > I only found a small number of remaining editorial ni

Re: [DNSOP] an editorial review of draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize-13

Paul, thanks for your expedite response to my review comments. Please see a few inline follow-up remarks below. I have deleted all parts that don't need further elaboration. >> (1) Section 1 >> >> (1.1) 1st paragraph >> >> [...] > >> b) In a few places, the draft uses very terse forms of preci