Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

2007-06-11 Thread Evan Hunt
> None of the below makes any difference. We do not know what instructions > Vixie has given Austein, and we do not need to know. > > The considerations for conflict of interest are well established: [...] > Austein needs to avoid participating in issues that affect > his company, its financial

Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

2007-06-11 Thread Paul Vixie
> > Austein needs to avoid participating in issues that affect > > his company, its financial position, or that of his co-workers. > > Should Rob recuse himself from *any* matter that Paul's sent an email > about? What about opinions Paul may have discussed with Rob privately? > Or just things he

Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

2007-06-11 Thread Dean Anderson
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Paul Vixie wrote: > > > Austein needs to avoid participating in issues that affect > > > his company, its financial position, or that of his co-workers. > > > > Should Rob recuse himself from *any* matter that Paul's sent an email > > about? What about opinions Paul may have

Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

2007-06-11 Thread Olafur Gudmundsson
This is getting silly, where Rob works, who Rob works with, who Rob talks to, are all irrelevant. Rob is a co-chair of the working group and serves at the pleasure of the AD, he can be terminated at any moment, if he engages in anything that the AD perceives as un-professional, un-ethical or just

Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

2007-06-11 Thread Dean Anderson
I have asked the IESG and the ISOC Attorney to intervene in this matter, informally. What Olafur says below is just complete nonsense. I also make a living, consult to companies that seek patents, and serve a non-profit anti-patent organization. My company also does IT consulting to companies th

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize-07

2007-06-11 Thread Kenji Rikitake
I reviewed the draft (sorry I was not in Prague). My comment which does not duplicate the previous comments of Joe Abley, Andrew Sullivan, and Rob Austein: > 4.5. Multi-homing of name servers across protocol families is less > likely to lead to or encounter truncation, partly because multipro

Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

2007-06-11 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 07:03:13PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote: > I have asked the IESG and the ISOC Attorney to intervene in this matter, > informally. Let me personally add that I find this a very sad moment in the already sorry history of DNS standardisation... Bert -- http://www.Pow