Bob Harold wrote:
> The only point I don't understand is why it the zones could not be
> signed, and all the anycast sites used slave copies.
That would break locally-served empty zones (RFC 6303) and private RFC
1918 reverse DNS.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Viking, North Ut
Looks good. The only point I don't understand is why it the zones could
not be signed, and all the anycast sites used slave copies. I realize that
would require separate zones instead of one "empty" zone, but it seems
doable. I don't think DNAME breaks that. Zone refresh and retry and
expire co
