On 30.6.2015 01:55, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Section 3 contains a obvious error
>
> "192.0.2.1 -> 2.0.192.in-addr.arpa." should be
> "192.0.2.1 -> 1.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa."
Thank you, I've fixed it in the Git repo.
I would really appreciate more feedback about Section 4 and definition of
canonicaliz
Section 3 contains a obvious error
"192.0.2.1 -> 2.0.192.in-addr.arpa." should be
"192.0.2.1 -> 1.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa."
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
__
On 3.6.2015 10:44, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <556ea478.80...@redhat.com>, Petr Spacek writes:
>> I would like early feedback about following idea about interaction between DN
>> S
>> updates (RFC 2136) and classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation (RFC 2317).
>>
>> In short, the RFC 2317 tells me to
In message <556ea478.80...@redhat.com>, Petr Spacek writes:
> Hello,
>
> I would like early feedback about following idea about interaction between DN
> S
> updates (RFC 2136) and classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation (RFC 2317).
>
> In short, the RFC 2317 tells me to fill reverse zone with CNAMEs p
