see inline.
Shumon Huque wrote on 2023-08-08 12:13:
At any rate, as I've remarked before, I'm not convinced that the
optimizations offered in Compact DoE were actually necessary as an
operational matter. But I'll leave it to our colleagues at Cloudflare to
argue that case. My interest in publi
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 11:50 AM Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2023, Ben Schwartz wrote:
>
> > If this is correct, then I'm not sure the complexity of solving the ENT
> problem is worthwhile.
>
I'm not sure which "ENT" problem Ben is referring to solving here. The draft
proposes ways to pre
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 10:45 AM Ben Schwartz wrote:
> Hi DNSOP,
>
> draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence currently says the following
> about RFC 4470:
>
>The response for a non-existent name requires up to 2 signed NSEC
>records or up to 3 signed NSEC3 records (and for online sig
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023, Ben Schwartz wrote:
If this is correct, then I'm not sure the complexity of solving the ENT problem
is worthwhile.
At $dayjob, I had to add bogus TXT records to our zones because of ENT
issues with Amazon Route53, which Amazon knows about and has refused to
fix for years.
