On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:30 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
>>I think reserving a DNS-like namespace anchor of ALT is unnecessary; as
>>I mentioned in my comments about the ONION draft, you have a choice of
>>anywhere in the namespace to place that anchor, and there are an
>>enormous number existing pl
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On 20 May 2015, at 22:13, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>> From the discussion on the mailing list, this draft appears to have
>> support in the working group. The authors have requested a Call for
>> Adoption. The chairs want to move forwar
Hi
The Adoption period passed last night and we had many comments, and the
rough consensus is that this should be adopted by the working group.
Authors, can you submit your updated version.
Thanks to all with the constructive comments.
tim
On 5/20/15 7:13 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
From the
In message <20150521163003.70706.qm...@ary.lan>, "John Levine" writes:
>
> >I think reserving a DNS-like namespace anchor of ALT is unnecessary; as
> >I mentioned in my comments about the ONION draft, you have a choice of
> >anywhere in the namespace to place that anchor, and there are an
> >e
In message , "Joe Abley" writ
es:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On 20 May 2015, at 22:13, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> > From the discussion on the mailing list, this draft appears to have
> > support in the working group. The authors have requested a Call for
> > Adoption. The chairs want to move forward with th
>I think reserving a DNS-like namespace anchor of ALT is unnecessary; as
>I mentioned in my comments about the ONION draft, you have a choice of
>anywhere in the namespace to place that anchor, and there are an
>enormous number existing places in the DNS where you can reserve a name
>without d
Hi Tim,
On 20 May 2015, at 22:13, Tim Wicinski wrote:
From the discussion on the mailing list, this draft appears to have
support in the working group. The authors have requested a Call for
Adoption. The chairs want to move forward with this draft if it has
consensus support.
This starts a
>Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
>by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
>Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
I think we should adopt it. I'm willing to review.
Since we're looking at it at t
