On 11/13/2015 09:55 AM, A. Schulze wrote:
consider a nameserver ns.example.com serving example.com. There is a
delegation from com. including glue.
Now we add a childzone sub.example.com. served by the same nameserver
ns.example.com.
should I add a entry in example.com to delegate the subzone to
Am 13.11.2015 um 18:50 schrieb Joe Abley:
As you say, best to install the delegation set in the parent zone even if the
choice of nameservers for the parent and child means it will be obscured.
thanks for the advise
Andreas
___
DNSOP mailing list
On 13 Nov 2015, at 12:06, Havard Eidnes wrote:
consider a nameserver ns.example.com serving example.com. There is a
delegation from com. including glue.
Now we add a childzone sub.example.com. served by the same nameserver
ns.example.com.
should I add a entry in example.com to delegate the su
> consider a nameserver ns.example.com serving example.com. There is a
> delegation from com. including glue.
> Now we add a childzone sub.example.com. served by the same nameserver
> ns.example.com.
>
> should I add a entry in example.com to delegate the subzone to myself?
Generally, yes, althoug
On 13/11/2015 16:55, A. Schulze wrote:
> should I add a entry in example.com to delegate the subzone to myself?
Yes, you should.
Ray
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Hello,
consider a nameserver ns.example.com serving example.com. There is a delegation
from com. including glue.
Now we add a childzone sub.example.com. served by the same nameserver
ns.example.com.
should I add a entry in example.com to delegate the subzone to myself?
Thanks for opinions!
An
