Am 01.11.18 um 00:03 schrieb Wessels, Duane:
> I think you might be the first person to argue for supporting multiple ZONEMD
> algorithms per zone. I actually expected more.
I remember Stephen Farrell saying something like "while designing new
protocols, algorithm agility is an important poin
On Nov 1, 2018, at 09:08, Richard Gibson
wrote:
RFC 2181 section 5: "It is meaningless for two records to ever have label,
class, type and data all equal - servers should suppress such duplicates if
encountered."
And RFC 7719 section 4 affirms the "different data" requirement.
Excellent.
Joe
On 10/31/18 19:50, Joe Abley wrote:
It sounds wrong to me to say that identical instances of RRs would not be
allowed in a zone.
It's true though, right? It's not meaningful to include more than one resource
record with the same (owner,type, class, TTL, RDATA) in the same RRSet, and
hence al
Hi Duane,
On 31 Oct 2018, at 19:03, Wessels, Duane wrote:
>> Section 1.2
>>
>> I don't understand the benefits of suggesting that verification of a zone
>> digest "would be implemented in name server software". The inference is that
>> software that normally concerns itself with responding to
Hi Joe,
Thanks for the detailed review.
> On Oct 29, 2018, at 2:45 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have read draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest-04.
>
> General Summary
>
> I find this document to be generally well-written, clear and unambiguous.
>
> ...
>
> Nits
>
> The document conta
Hi all,
I have read draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest-04.
General Summary
I find this document to be generally well-written, clear and unambiguous.
I think being able to embed a checksum in a zone, which can be authenticated
using DNSSEC, is generally useful. I think describing the construction an
