Re: [DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld

2020-05-26 Thread Petr Špaček
On 26. 05. 20 18:00, Roy Arends wrote: > >> On 26 May 2020, at 16:06, Petr Špaček wrote: >> >> On 02. 05. 20 16:09, Roy Arends wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft. >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt >>> >>>

Re: [DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld

2020-05-26 Thread Roy Arends
> On 26 May 2020, at 16:06, Petr Špaček wrote: > > On 02. 05. 20 16:09, Roy Arends wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft. >> >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt >> >> This draft has substantial more information than

Re: [DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld

2020-05-26 Thread Petr Špaček
On 02. 05. 20 16:09, Roy Arends wrote: > Hi, > > Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft. > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt > > This draft has substantial more information than the first draft. It explains > that a private-use namespace

Re: [DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld

2020-05-26 Thread Roy Arends
Hi Partick > On 7 May 2020, at 19:40, Patrick Mevzek wrote: > > On 02/05/2020 09:09, Roy Arends wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft. >> >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt > > While I do not have hard facts but jus

Re: [DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld

2020-05-26 Thread Roy Arends
Hi John, > On 6 May 2020, at 03:57, John Levine wrote: > > In article <5d255eee-4cab-44d6-8c47-bbe9c7f5c...@hopcount.ca> you write: >>> It contains plenty of examples of how user-assigned code elements are used >>> in the field, including >> other ISO standards, the UN, UNICODE, CAB/forum, and

Re: [DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld

2020-05-26 Thread Roy Arends
Hi Joe, thanks for your thoughtful comments. > On 6 May 2020, at 02:18, Joe Abley wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > I have read this document and I like it. > > There have been other proposals to make recommendations like this in the past > that I have not been very enthusiastic about. The reason I like

Re: [DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld

2020-05-07 Thread Patrick Mevzek
On 02/05/2020 09:09, Roy Arends wrote: > Hi, > > Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft. > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt While I do not have hard facts but just a gut feeling, I would feel safer if "xn" is excluded from the possible li

Re: [DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld

2020-05-05 Thread John Levine
In article <5d255eee-4cab-44d6-8c47-bbe9c7f5c...@hopcount.ca> you write: >> It contains plenty of examples of how user-assigned code elements are used >> in the field, including >other ISO standards, the UN, UNICODE, CAB/forum, and the IETF itself. I also think it's an improvement, and concur wit

Re: [DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld

2020-05-05 Thread Joe Abley
Hi Roy, On 2 May 2020, at 10:09, Roy Arends wrote: > Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft. > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt > > This draft has substantial more information than the first draft. It explains > that a private-use names

[DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld

2020-05-02 Thread Roy Arends
Hi, Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft. https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt This draft has substantial more information than the first draft. It explains that a private-use namespace does not exist, why it is needed, and how a namespace