Dean Anderson wrote:
Todd is right. While I rather doubt that the USG /would/ shut down the
roots or ARIN (thats pretty extreme), I believe the objective of the
bill is to make explicit and indisputable USG control over
infrastructure. As I understand it, the objective of the bill is so that
the
Dean Anderson wrote:
BTW, RFC2870 is not the authority on root server operations. The
authority is found in the MoU with ICANN that root server operators are
supposed to sign. Rumor has it that many root server operaters haven't
signed the MoU, defying ICANN's authority over their operation.
> Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:48:21 -0700
> From: Todd Glassey
>
> Actually Dean - good point - the MOU was never codified in a formal
> contract meaning that the US Department of Commerce still formally owns
> the root's and so under this newly proposed cyber-control law would give
> the US Presid
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 07:44:43AM -0700, Todd Glassey wrote:
> Since the Internet is formally listed as a component of US Critical
> Infrastructure - I want to know the specific provisioning requirements
> for operating a root server. Anyone got a pointer to these?
>
> Todd Glassey
> __
Since the Internet is formally listed as a component of US Critical
Infrastructure - I want to know the specific provisioning requirements
for operating a root server. Anyone got a pointer to these?
Todd Glassey
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
h
