Davey Song wrote:
Of all your observations, this one is the trickiest. :(
Right now the protocol is clearly based on HTTP/1.1, although we
have
an implementation that works fine with HTTP/2 since the Go HTTP
library
supports it (basically) transp
Hi guys,
Thanks for the comments and discussion. I catch up them after holidays :)
I reply in line and cc Paul's comments to DNSOP WG mailing list, so that
we can continue to comment follow the same context in this mailing list.
Best regards,
Davey.
On 30 April 2016 at 06:23, Paul Vixie wrote
Responding to only one part:
> >- Note that choosing POST (not GET) as the request method for DNS
> > >wire-format over HTTP is mainly based on two reasons. One is that
> > >the protocol is designed using HTTP as a tunnel-like technology
> > >carrying data from one side to another
Julian,
Thanks for the feedback! Comments below...
On 2016-04-28 20:12:52+0200 (Thursday)
Julian Reschke wrote:
> below some feedback...
>
> >One of alternative way of DNS described in that document is to
>
> s/of//
Thanks, rephrased slightly.
> >transport DNS binary data inside
