Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-01

2016-07-17 Thread Patrik Fältström
On 17 Jul 2016, at 11:16, Dan York wrote: > The new -01 draft looks good.  I need to do a deeper read but I'll point out > one additional term we found in the development of  > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-york-dnsop-deploying-dnssec-crypto-algs/ >   Not all registries accept DS. Som

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-01

2016-07-17 Thread Dan York
Paul, The new -01 draft looks good. I need to do a deeper read but I'll point out one additional term we found in the development of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-york-dnsop-deploying-dnssec-crypto-algs/ DNS server deployments today that deploy DNSSEC often have an additional compone