Re: [DNSOP] Trust History draft

2009-10-05 Thread W.C.A. Wijngaards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Florian, On 10/05/2009 08:52 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > I don't understand this part: > | validator configuration. The validator then fetches old DNSKEY > | RRsets and checks they form a chain to the latest key. > > Doesn't this defeat the purpo

Re: [DNSOP] Trust History draft

2009-10-04 Thread Florian Weimer
* W. C. A. Wijngaards: > Hi, > > Just new in the dnsop wg tools page: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wijngaards-dnsop-trust-history-00 I don't understand this part: | DNSSEC [RFC4034] validators that have been offline or have missed an | (emergency) rollover can use trust history service to

[DNSOP] trust-history draft updated to -01

2009-07-09 Thread W.C.A. Wijngaards
Hi, http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-wijngaards-dnsop-trust-history-01.txt Spelling of the working group, comments made by the dns expert and fix for algorithm rollover in the history. I am asking for adoption by the working group, but Bill Manning made me aware of the

[DNSOP] Trust History draft

2009-06-30 Thread W.C.A. Wijngaards
Hi, Just new in the dnsop wg tools page: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wijngaards-dnsop-trust-history-00 This is the same version as draft-wijngaards-dnsext-trust-history-03, but moved to the DNSOP wg. I would like to request adoption of the document. Why? I want to enable end users to use