Moin!
On 17 Jul 2015, at 19:28, hellekin wrote:
authoritative servers (who never would get a request for .onion
anyway)
*** They could if there's no RFC to forbid it. Actually they could
even
with such a document, but other actors would then rightfully decline
their non-NXDOMAIN response.
R
On 7/18/15, 3:39, "DNSOP on behalf of Ralf Weber" wrote:
>I'm ok with .onion being
>a special name, but we should just do that by normal DNS
>mechanism. What's wrong with answering REFUSED?. Answering
>NXDomain is much harder in a DNSSEC world.
If "onion" is not delegated in the root zone, then D
On 07/17/2015 10:39 PM, Ralf Weber wrote:
>
> Am I right that there is leakage of dns requests with
> .onion TLDs? If so isn't that a bug in their software?
>
*** Almost:
1) .onion is not a TLD (sorry, I made the mistake myself to abuse TLD,
although I had defined pTLD for that purpose--as in: p
Moin!
On 17 Jul 2015, at 8:00, Hugo Maxwell Connery wrote:
> For those who are trying to provide their comments to the
> 6761 discussions, I highly recommend:
>
> 1. go to https torproject org and download the client
> 2. Have wireshark / ethereal
> 3. Start 2 and then 3 and see what happens on
For those who are trying to provide their comments to the
6761 discussions, I highly recommend:
1. go to https torproject org and download the client
2. Have wireshark / ethereal
3. Start 2 and then 3 and see what happens on the wire.
You can also access all of the design discussion and materi
