Re: [DNSOP] TCP server timeout

I like your proposed text so if there is no objection I suggest to simply adopt it (and to close this particular point). Thanks francis.dup...@fdupont.fr PS: for people who want to match the text here are the first 2 lines: we should allow servers to use whatever timeout they want -- but we

Re: [DNSOP] TCP server timeout

> Francis Dupont > Wednesday, March 25, 2015 3:48 PM > In your previous mail you wrote: > >> i believe that the last of the old-style initiators who treated >> premature closure by the responder as an urgent condition warranting a >> message to the console o

Re: [DNSOP] TCP server timeout

In your previous mail you wrote: > i believe that the last of the old-style initiators who treated > premature closure by the responder as an urgent condition warranting a > message to the console or the system log file have diminished to the > level of noise, but that the change francis is a