Hi Ben, thanks again for your comments! We've uploaded a new version that
takes them into account.
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 at 17:40, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Benjamin Kaduk
> Review result: Has Issues
>
> # SecDir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verifica
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:46 AM Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> > ### CNAME chaining
> >
> > In §3.2 we see the text "Another issue with CNAME records is that they
> must
> > not point to another CNAME" provided, with no reference. But CNAME
> chains are
> > in heavy use on the internet in practice wit
Hi Paul, all,
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:46:30AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2023, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:
>
> [co-author hat on]
>
[...]
>
> > ### Continuing Ownership
> >
> > While I see the example in Appendix A.1.4.1 about Atlassian, when we say in
> > the intr
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:
[co-author hat on]
Reviewer: Benjamin Kaduk
Review result: Has Issues
# SecDir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-01
Thanks for the review!
On the whole the content is reasonable, but read on for some suggest
Reviewer: Benjamin Kaduk
Review result: Has Issues
# SecDir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-01
CC @kaduk
## Discuss
## Comments
I'm a little nervous about allocating a new BCP number for a topic of fairly
narrow scope such as this, but the guidance is good and worth pu
