On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:31:53AM -0400,
Michael StJohns wrote
a message of 41 lines which said:
> I'm actually somewhat opposed to adopting Joe's trustanchor draft- I
> don't think the cost/benefit analysis works.
>
> We already have a set of formats for trust anchors - DNS master file
> DS
I think I have to agree with you regarding the level of effort to make a go of
this… that said, Joe was/is a member of the ICANN root key rollover team and
is likely the spokesmodel
for the plan they have come up with. To the extent that this may be true, I
believe ICANN is wiling to pay the c
I'm actually somewhat opposed to adopting Joe's trustanchor draft- I
don't think the cost/benefit analysis works.
We already have a set of formats for trust anchors - DNS master file DS
and DNSKEY records. What the document adds is a signature mechanism
over those items (now formatted as eit
