On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:06:44PM -0500, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> The two options are alternative proposals - there should never be a reality
> where both proposals exist as supported options.
Right. The question is whether you think people are going to behave
well (which is more or less what Ra
On 1/22/15 10:54 AM, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:
* PROTOCOL: Is the expected behaviour (MUST) from both client and server
that they should add the Option to every single request / response during a
keepalive session? Please clarify the intended behaviour..
Two final comments, sorry:
* EDITORI
> * PROTOCOL: Is the expected behaviour (MUST) from both client and server
> that they should add the Option to every single request / response during a
> keepalive session? Please clarify the intended behaviour..
Two final comments, sorry:
* EDITORIAL/PROTOCOL: Shouldn't the option (as well as t
Hi,
I've reviewed the keepalive draft. Generally, i do like the concept a lot
because: a) there's certainly a use case that covers real operational issues
b) it's a space-efficient and c) unobstrusive. However, i think the document
could improve on clarity in certain aspects - see below for d
