Re: [DNSOP] RFC4641bis Section 4.4.5 proposed new text

2009-05-26 Thread Florian Weimer
* Antoin Verschuren: >There are multiple reasons why a registrant may want to change it's "its"? "their?" >changed so such rollover scenario will not work. Besides if zone >transfers are not allowed by the losing DNS operator and NSEC3 is >deployed in the zone then the gaining

Re: [DNSOP] RFC4641bis Section 4.4.5 proposed new text

2009-05-20 Thread Scott Rose
Antoin Verschuren wrote: > Hi All, > > I have drafted some new proposed text for section 4.4.5 of RFC4641bis. > I tried to bring some more structure to the section while maintaining most of > the text from the current iteration of the document. > It now clearly separates: > -Definition of terms >

[DNSOP] RFC4641bis Section 4.4.5 proposed new text

2009-05-20 Thread Antoin Verschuren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi All, I have drafted some new proposed text for section 4.4.5 of RFC4641bis. I tried to bring some more structure to the section while maintaining most of the text from the current iteration of the document. It now clearly separates: - -Definitio