Re: [DNSOP] RFC 2181 - reconsiderations

2015-06-08 Thread Jared Mauch
> On Jun 8, 2015, at 3:11 PM, manning wrote: > > What do you think? Is there a reason to not do this? DNS implementation details are much cleaner than others (e.g.: BGP) in finding the root documents and all the additive parts. In other words, I support pushing these out. - Jared _

[DNSOP] RFC 2181 - reconsiderations

2015-06-08 Thread manning
Morning y’all.RFC 2181 is a “grab bag” of eight independent items that, 17 years ago, were not considered “large” enough to warrant dedicated RFCs. Quoting from the abstract of the RFC: "Eight separate issues are considered: + IP packet header address usage from multi-homed servers,