Re: [DNSOP] Question for someone with a V6 capable recursive resolver...

2010-07-29 Thread Doug Barton
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Nicholas Weaver wrote: Could someone with a IPv6 connected recursive resolver do a favor for me? Validate that ipv6_dns.eaoe.n1.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu resolves to 67.202.37.63 host ipv6_dns.eaoe.n1.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu

Re: [DNSOP] Question for someone with a V6 capable recursive resolver...

2010-07-29 Thread Tore Anderson
* Nicholas Weaver > Actually, thats not unexpected: roland is V4 only, but the after > is V6, so dig -6 is wrong Well, you did ask for a v6-connected recursive resolver so I checked it from a single-stack one. (It fails without the "-6" as well.) But I suppose the answer you're after is in

Re: [DNSOP] Question for someone with a V6 capable recursive resolver...

2010-07-29 Thread Nicholas Weaver
Actually, thats not unexpected: roland is V4 only, but the after is V6, so dig -6 is wrong (just dig on a v6 machine works, the name can't resolve if you are V6 only as our primary DNS server is V4 only): dig +trace ipv6_dns.eaoe.n1.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu ; <<>> DiG 9.7.1-P2-RedHat-9

Re: [DNSOP] Question for someone with a V6 capable recursive resolver...

2010-07-29 Thread Tore Anderson
* Nicholas Weaver > Could someone with a IPv6 connected recursive resolver do a favor for > me? > > Validate that > > ipv6_dns.eaoe.n1.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu > > resolves to > > 67.202.37.63 Hi Nicholas. It doesn't work, the delegation chain stops at roland

[DNSOP] Question for someone with a V6 capable recursive resolver...

2010-07-29 Thread Nicholas Weaver
Could someone with a IPv6 connected recursive resolver do a favor for me? Validate that ipv6_dns.eaoe.n1.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu resolves to 67.202.37.63 (this is a new test name being integrated into Netalyzr, where the only authority reco