Stephane,
At 2016-04-29 16:35:41 +0200
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 04:31:15PM +0200,
> Shane Kerr wrote
> a message of 49 lines which said:
>
> > I think I said this in person but I don't know if I ever wrote it
> > down.
>
> You did :-)
>
> > If the proposal do
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 04:31:15PM +0200,
Shane Kerr wrote
a message of 49 lines which said:
> I think I said this in person but I don't know if I ever wrote it
> down.
You did :-)
> If the proposal does go forward (I really have no feeling whether it
> is useful or not), then perhaps this c
Stephane,
At 2016-04-29 15:57:27 +0200
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> No objection from the AS112 operators was received. Now, what do you
> think of this draft? Should we continue or is it a bad idea (or a good
> one, but hopeless?)
I think I said this in person but I don't know if I ever wrote
No objection from the AS112 operators was received. Now, what do you
think of this draft? Should we continue or is it a bad idea (or a good
one, but hopeless?)
--- Begin Message ---
A new version of I-D, draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Stephane Bortzmeyer and
