On 20:55 05/09, Shumon Huque wrote:
> > > I'm thinking of a (broken) nameserver that responds to NSs queries with
> > > NXDOMAIN (but does answer to other types)[1]. Is that a positive
> > > response, which should be cached with an authoritative data ranking?
> >
>
> We cover this case in the 3rd
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 7:02 PM Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> Hugo Salgado wrote on 2022-08-16 14:19:
> > Dear authors.
> > In the second paragraph of section 3 "Upgrading NS RRset Credibility"
> > there is a mention of "Positive responses...", which I am not sure of
> > its exact meaning. Do you mean AN
Hugo Salgado wrote on 2022-08-16 14:19:
Dear authors.
In the second paragraph of section 3 "Upgrading NS RRset Credibility"
there is a mention of "Positive responses...", which I am not sure of
its exact meaning. Do you mean ANSWERS>0? Or AA=1?
i think if the text were "positive responses" t
Dear authors.
In the second paragraph of section 3 "Upgrading NS RRset Credibility"
there is a mention of "Positive responses...", which I am not sure of
its exact meaning. Do you mean ANSWERS>0? Or AA=1?
I'm thinking of a (broken) nameserver that responds to NSs queries with
NXDOMAIN (but does a
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 10:19 AM Joe Abley wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 00:12, Shumon Huque wrote:
>
> This document looks good. Some comments:
>>
>> In fact, the Extensible Provisioning
>> Protocol (EPP) [RFC5731], that is often used by TLDs to configure
>> delegation parameters has n
On Mar 9, 2022, at 00:12, Shumon Huque wrote:
>> This document looks good. Some comments:
>>
>> In fact, the Extensible Provisioning
>> Protocol (EPP) [RFC5731], that is often used by TLDs to configure
>> delegation parameters has no provision to set the TTL. This inhibits
>> a
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022, Paul Vixie wrote:
Yeah, this is Paul V's re-worked text regarding revalidation, so I'll
defer to him. Feel free to suggest specific rewording though.
huh. i think the problem is that this paragraph is only one sentence long. my
high school english teachers would have ber
see inline.
Shumon Huque wrote on 2022-03-08 21:12:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:04 PM Paul Wouters
<mailto:40aiven...@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, internet-dra...@ietf.org
<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Subject: [DNSOP] I-D Action: d
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:04 PM Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
> > Subject: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-02.txt
>
> This document looks good. Some comments:
>
> In fact, the Extensible Provisio
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Subject: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-02.txt
This document looks good. Some comments:
In fact, the Extensible Provisioning
Protocol (EPP) [RFC5731], that is often used by TLDs to configure
delegation
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Delegation Revalidation by DNS Resolvers
Authors : Shumon Huque
Paul
11 matches
Mail list logo
