On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Jim Hague wrote:
We'll discuss this. We absolutely meant for negative keys to be
restricted to closed systems. Allowing string keys in addition is an
interesting idea; off the cuff, I wonder whether folk will want to pay
the file space penalty.
The cost of interoperabilit
On 28/02/2018 06:36, Richard Gibson wrote:
> Thank you so much for the changes, I am confident that this format is
> now in a state where my organization could build on top of it to suit
> our needs.
Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated!
> * Section 6.2.1 and 7.5.3.4: At minimum, RR field "tt
On 23/02/2018 12:56, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:31:29PM +,
> Sara Dickinson wrote
> a message of 51 lines which said:
>
>> We have an update to draft which we hope captures all the comments
>> to-date.
>
> I think so, too. At least, it captured mine :-)
Good.
Thank you so much for the changes, I am confident that this format is
now in a state where my organization could build on top of it to suit
our needs. I have a handful of remaining comments below, mostly
describing ways in which that process could be made more straightforward
and standardized.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:31:29PM +,
Sara Dickinson wrote
a message of 51 lines which said:
> We have an update to draft which we hope captures all the comments
> to-date.
I think so, too. At least, it captured mine :-)
> There are still a number of ‘QUESTIONS’ in the draft that we woul
Hi Folks,
We have an update to draft which we hope captures all the comments to-date.
- Make all data items in Q/R, QuerySignature and Malformed Message arrays
optional
- Re-structure the FilePreamble and ConfigurationParameters into BlockParameters
- BlockParameters has separate Storage and C
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : C-DNS: A DNS Packet Capture Format
Authors : John Dickinson
Jim Hague
