Thanks for the responses, Geoff.
One minor follow-up:
> The final point I am not so convinced about. The reason is scope of the
> document. This document is an instruction to folk who write DNS recursive
> resolvers. It is not an instruction to folk who want to set up zones that
> could be us
Hi Jari,
thanks for spending the time and doing this review.
in response to the points you raise:
1. Jargon is just a constant factor in this space, and yes, the use of “CD bit”
snuck in with either a reference to an explanation. I’ll uzse a reference to
section 3.2.2 of RFC4035
2. your secon
Reviewer: Jari Arkko
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
