You are correct Eric. I was pointing it out to the working group I
co-chair, but hope other WG Chairs would do the same thing.
And thank you Paul and Warren for offering your time to discuss the
duties.
tim
On 11/27/15 2:23 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
if i may, i would like to sugge
if i may, i would like to suggest that while there is value that can be
added from contributors to dnsop, the scope of policy currently
entertained by the corporation so many love to slag includes privacy
(whois, or was, on port 43), data retention under national laws, the
operational mechanics
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:28 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
All
In case this did not end up in your mailbox, the ICANN Technical Liaison
Group (TLG) is relevant to our interests. I think there are many
competent people in DNSOP (inclu
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:28 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> All
>
> In case this did not end up in your mailbox, the ICANN Technical Liaison
> Group (TLG) is relevant to our interests. I think there are many
> competent people in DNSOP (including the current liaisons Warren Kumari
> and Paul Wouters
All
In case this did not end up in your mailbox, the ICANN Technical Liaison
Group (TLG) is relevant to our interests. I think there are many
competent people in DNSOP (including the current liaisons Warren Kumari
and Paul Wouters) who could add value.
thanks
tim
Forwarded Mess
