The reason I did so was that I did not believe that the initial presentation
of KEYASSURE to the wider Internet community gave an accurate or full
description of what the intended proposal was.
Since neither of the proposers took any notice of my repeated requests to
correct this situation, I deci
Phillip,
you present your views by cross-posting several other IETF mailing list
without posting this to keyass...@ietf.org. This doesn't give potential
readers full picture about what's happening in the keyassure and what is
the general consensus in the list.
So please all - if you want to
For the past month I have been participating in the KEYASSURE discussions.
One aspect of those discussions that was not made clear in the original
notice sent out is that the group is not only considering key assurance, the
proposals made are also intended to have security policy semantics.
This
