All
The Call for Adoption period for this document has ended and the group
consensus to adopt this document.
The authors should resubmit the document with the naming sequence to
drop this into place.
thanks
tim
On 11/26/14 10:58 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
This starts a Call for Adoption f
Strongly support. Willing to contribute/review/etc.
Regards,
-drc
On Nov 26, 2014, at 7:58 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
> draft-livingood-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors. There was much discussion at
> the last meeting about adopting this draft and working on
> On Nov 26, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
> draft-livingood-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors. There was much discussion at
> the last meeting about adopting this draft and working on it.
>
> The draft is available here:
>
> https://datat
I support the adoption of the document. It is one of the identified
requirement in the DNSSEC Validator Requirements draft.
BR,
Daniel
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:58:52AM -0500, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> > This starts a Call for Adoption for
> > dr
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:58:52AM -0500, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
> draft-livingood-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors. There was much discussion
> at the last meeting about adopting this draft and working on it.
Support adoption, will review and contribute text if ne
At Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:58:52 -0500,
Tim Wicinski wrote:
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
> draft-livingood-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors. There was much discussion
> at the last meeting about adopting this draft and working on it.
>
> The draft is available here:
>
> https://datatracker.
I support the adoption and will review/post comments. I think this draft will
be a necessity as DNSSEC validation gets wider deployment.
Scott
On Nov 26, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
> draft-livingood-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors. There was
On Nov 26, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by
> DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
I think the draft is worth adopting, and the practice is worth documenting. I
have seriously considere
I support this draft becoming a WG work item, and will review drafts as they
proceed. I expect there to be a lot of wordsmithing done on it after that
happens, but I believe that this WG can come to rough consensus on the topic
and implementation.
--Paul Hoffman
__
This starts a Call for Adoption for
draft-livingood-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors. There was much discussion
at the last meeting about adopting this draft and working on it.
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-livingood-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors/
Pl
10 matches
Mail list logo
